1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 712 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Austin-Healey | MCC |
Model | Sports Convertible | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1810 mm |