1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 237 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sports Convertible | Clio |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |