1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2852 mm |
