1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Jaguar |
| Model | Sports Convertible | XF |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2908 mm |
