1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1952 Porsche 356
To start off, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1952 Porsche 356. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1952 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 715 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1952 Porsche 356 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Porsche |
| Model | Tickford | 356 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2110 mm |
