1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1955 Ford 12 M is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | 12 M |
Year Released | 1953 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |