1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1957 Holden FJ
To start off, 1957 Holden FJ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 530 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1957 Holden FJ | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Tickford | FJ |
Year Released | 1953 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2150 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |