1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1963 DKW F 11 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 800 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | DKW |
Model | Tickford | F 11 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2260 mm |