1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1963 DKW F 11 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 780 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | DKW |
| Model | Tickford | F 11 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 889 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2260 mm |
