1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 130 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2960 mm |
