1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1968 Renault 8
To start off, 1968 Renault 8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1968 Renault 8. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 710 kg more than 1968 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1968 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | 8 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2270 mm |
