1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (125 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 10 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass (306 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm). This means 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tickford | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 125 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
