1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1980 Ford Escort
To start off, 1980 Ford Escort is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1980 Ford Escort. (79 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Escort. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 665 kg more than 1980 Ford Escort. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Escort. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1980 Ford Escort | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Tickford | Escort |
Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2400 mm |