1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 535 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Dodge |
| Model | Tickford | Omni |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1716 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |
