1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 470 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mahindra |
| Model | Tickford | Armada |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4310 mm |
