1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 315 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tickford | Space Runner |
Year Released | 1953 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |