1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Dodge |
| Model | Tickford | Neon |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2650 mm |
