1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 820 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tickford | Minica |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |