1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Fiat Duna
To start off, 2001 Fiat Duna is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2001 Fiat Duna. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2001 Fiat Duna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 600 kg more than 2001 Fiat Duna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Fiat Duna. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Fiat Duna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Fiat Duna | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Fiat |
| Model | Tickford | Duna |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2370 mm |
