1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Lada 111
To start off, 2002 Lada 111 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Lada 111. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 485 kg more than 2002 Lada 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 111. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Lada 111 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lada |
| Model | Tickford | 111 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |
