1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mini |
| Model | Tickford | Cooper |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2470 mm |
