1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 253 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Fiat |
Model | Tickford | Palio II |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2550 mm |