1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 906 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lincoln |
Model | Tickford | Mark LT |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2436 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3520 mm |