1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2006 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 172 kg more than 2006 Mazda B2300.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2006 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Tickford | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1358 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2840 mm |
