1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 545 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Tickford | Clio |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1149 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2480 mm |
