1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 175 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Tickford | 6 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |