1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
| Model | Tickford | UTE |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
