1953 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford. (185 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Tickford | Malibu |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2852 mm |