1953 BMW 340 vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1960 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 BMW 340 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 1960 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 340 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2060 mm |
