1953 BMW 340 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 825 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 340 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | Calais |
Year Released | 1953 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3300 mm |