1953 BMW 340 vs. 2000 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (290 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 577 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 2000 Cadillac Seville | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 340 | Seville |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1827 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
