1953 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 425 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 340 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
