1953 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 680 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 340 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3030 mm |
