1953 BMW 340 vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (149 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 740 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 340 | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 340 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2630 mm |