1953 BMW 340 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 11 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 2008 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 340 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2860 mm |
