1953 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 310 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 340 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | STS |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2960 mm |