1953 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (172 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340.
Because 1953 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 BMW 340 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 340 | HHR |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |
