1953 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 340 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 340 | XF |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2910 mm |