1953 BMW 340 vs. 2009 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1953 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1953 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 805 kg more than 1953 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 340 | 2009 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 340 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |