1953 BMW 501 vs. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,428 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 420 kg more than 1953 BMW 501.
Because 1953 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 501 | 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 501 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 1953 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2428 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3040 mm |