1953 BMW 501 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 164 kg more than 1953 BMW 501.
Because 1953 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 BMW 501 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 501 | Compass |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1449 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2634 mm |