1953 Bristol 403 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1953 Bristol 403. (86 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1953 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 805 kg more than 1953 Bristol 403. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Bristol 403 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 403 | 62 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |