1953 Bristol 403 vs. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (286 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1953 Bristol 403. (86 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1953 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 36 kg more than 1953 Bristol 403. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Bristol 403. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Bristol 403. (146 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Bristol 403. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1953 Bristol 403 has manual transmission. 1953 Bristol 403 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Bristol 403 | 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 403 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 4161 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 374 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 83 L |