1953 Bristol 404 vs. 2000 Ford Equator

To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Bristol 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Bristol 404 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Bristol 404 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1953 Bristol 404. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 1953 Bristol 404. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 168 kg more than 1953 Bristol 404. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Bristol 404. (152 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Bristol 404. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 1953 Bristol 404 has manual transmission. 1953 Bristol 404 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: