1953 Buick 40 vs. 1956 Lotus 11
To start off, 1956 Lotus 11 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1956 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Buick 40 | 1956 Lotus 11 | |
| Make | Buick | Lotus |
| Model | 40 | 11 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2160 mm |
