1953 Buick 40 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1960 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1953 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | 62 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3310 mm |