1953 Buick 40 vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1963 Lotus Elite is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Buick 40 | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Buick | Lotus |
| Model | 40 | Elite |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2240 mm |
