1953 Buick 40 vs. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 450 kg more than 1953 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1953 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3300 mm |