1953 Buick 40 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Buick 40 | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2320 mm |