1953 Buick 40 vs. 1974 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1974 Zastava 1300 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1974 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Buick 40 | 1974 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Buick | Zastava |
| Model | 40 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 4315 cc | 1293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2430 mm |
